The temperature of the star is estimated using the color of the star. Using the fact that this is a blue star, we estimate that the temperature is 20,000-30,000K.
Grading scheme:
q 1 point for stating that temperature comes from color
q 2 points for getting something in the appropriate range (20,000-30,000)
q 1 point for using correct unit (either K or degrees-C).
You derive the luminosity of the star using two facts: the distance (d) and the observed flux of radiation from the star (F). The luminosity is then given by
![]()
Let’s write this expression twice, once for the star (subscript *) and once for the Sun (subscript Sun):

Now divide these two expressions to get the ratio of the star’s and the Sun’s luminosity:
![]()
Finally, cancel the 4p’s and plug in the numbers relevant to the star and the Sun (remembering that the questions tells you that the ratio F*/FSUN=1000):
![]()
So, the star is 9000 times more luminous than
the Sun.
Grading scheme:
q 2 points for correct formula (or for just recognizing general approach)
q 2 points for correct answer.
From the lectures, the formula relating the mass of a central star (M) to the distance (d) and period (P) of an orbiting planet/spaceship is:
![]()
So, comparing the orbit of the spacecraft around the star and the Earth around the Sun, you deduce that the ratio of the mass of the star and the mass of the Sun is:
![]()
Cancel the constants, and plug the number in:

So, the star is 108 times the mass of the Sun.
Grading scheme
q 1 point for general effort
q 2 point for identifying correct formula (or otherwise demonstrating a clear understanding of what’s going on!)
q 2 points for correct answer
Do you think this star
will suffer a supernova explosion at some point in the future? Will it leave a White Dwarf, a Neutron Star
or a Black Hole?
A star with such a large mass will certainly undergo a supernova explosion, leaving behind a black hole.
Grading scheme
q 1 point for stating that star will undergo supernova
q 1 point for stating that a black hole will be left behind
The amount of hydrogen initially in the Sun is (0.75)´(2´1030)kg=1.5´1030kg. Thus, if it burns at a constant rate of 6´1011kg/s, it will take
![]()
to burn through all of this hydrogen. Now, the number of seconds in a year is 60´60´24´365=31,536,000s. So, dividing the number above by this, it will take 79.3 billion years to burn through all of the Sun’s hydrogen.
Grading scheme:
q 1 point for general effort
q 1 point for correctly using the “75%”
q 1 point for dividing the amount of hydrogen by the rate
q 1 point for dividing the life-time in seconds by number of seconds in a year.
q 1 points for doing these calculations correctly!
[5 points] The above calculation is the time that it takes to burn through ALL of the Sun’s hydrogen. But, the nuclear reactions only occur in the Sun’s core, so not all of the Sun’s hydrogen participates in the nuclear fusion. In fact, only about 1/8th of the Sun’s mass participates… hence the lifetime is shorter by a factor of 8.