Next: Implications for models of
Up: Discussion and conclusions
Previous: Discussion and conclusions
The study described in Sections 3 and 4 represents the most detailed
study of the Deep Minimum state of MCG
6-30-15 to date. We have come
to two important conclusions.
- We have demonstrated the robustness of the extremely broadened
disk reflection features reported in Paper I. We employ the
generalized thin disk model of Agol & Krolik (2000), which includes a
torque applied at the radius of marginal stability
, and
find that this inner torque is dominating the energetics of the
system. In other words, the Deep Minimum disk is shining via the
extraction of spin-energy from the central black hole and not through
accretion.
- Examination of both the difference spectra and direct spectral fits to
the 10ksec segments of data shows that the intensity of the broad
disk feature is consistent with being proportional to the 2-10keV
flux. In other words, the equivalent width of the disk feature is
roughly constant as the source undergoes its large amplitude
variability. This is expected from the simplest X-ray reflection
model.
It is important to compare and contrast these results with studies of
MCG
6-30-15 in its normal state. In their paper that originally
identified the Deep Minimum state, Iwasawa et al. (1996) used ASCA to show that the iron line profile was substantially broader in
the Deep Minimum than at other times. More recently, Fabian et
al. (2002; hereafter F02) examined an independent and long (350ksec)
XMM-Newton observation of MCG
6-30-15 which mostly caught it
in its normal flux state. In agreement with the expectation from
Iwasawa et al. (1996), F02 found the iron line profile to be generally
narrower than in the Deep Minimum state of Paper I, although they
clearly noted an extreme red-tail extending down to
keV.
Fitting the iron line with a near-extreme Kerr black hole model
(
) using a broken-powerlaw emissivity profile indicated a
rather flat emissivity profile (
) for
, breaking to a steep profile (
) within this radius.
Thus, the principal difference in the shape of the emissivity profile
between the Deep Minimum and normal states of MCG
6-30-15 appears to
lie beyond some radius
. While it is beyond the
scope of this paper to fit our physical accretion disk models to the
long XMM-Newton data set, it is clear that a torque-dominated
disk around a rapidly spinning black hole cannot reproduce the normal
state emissivity profile.
There are also interesting differences in the spectral variability
properties of the two states. Careful analysis of the RXTE-PCA
data for MCG
6-30-15 during the normal state clearly showed that the
iron line flux underwent significant variations but was not correlated
with the continuum flux (Lee et al. 2000; Reynolds 2000; Vaughan &
Edelson 2001). This was confirmed in a rather direct manner by Shih,
Iwasawa & Fabian (2002) who used the 910ksec ASCA observation of
MCG
6-30-15 to show that neither the intensity nor profile of the
iron line were functions of the continuum flux. Finally, Fabian et
al. (2002) and Fabian & Vaughan (2003) examined the long (350ksec)
XMM-Newton/EPIC data of MCG
6-30-15 in its normal state and
found that the hard-band difference spectra were all well described by
power-law forms. Using this fact, these authors decompose the EPIC-pn
spectrum into an almost constant reflection dominated component and
variable power-law component. This is clearly different to the
behaviour that we find during the Deep Minimum state.
Next: Implications for models of
Up: Discussion and conclusions
Previous: Discussion and conclusions
Chris Reynolds
2004-01-15