Initially, we consider only the 2-10keV part of the spectrum and,
furthermore, assume that the underlying continuum spectrum (i.e.,
prior to the effects of any reflection/reprocessing) is well described
by a power-law. The restriction on the energy band is intended to
avoid complexities associated with the well-known dusty warm absorber
displayed by this object (Nandra & Pounds 1992; Reynolds 1997;
Reynolds et al. 1997; George et al. 1998; Lee et al. 2001), as well as
any oxygen and nitrogen recombination lines that may originate from
the accretion disk (Branduardi-Raymont 2001; Sako et al. 2002). The
power-law assumption is justified since, over this spectral range,
almost all detailed models of thermal Comptonisation in AGN disk
coronae predict a very good power-law form. The principal reason for
this is that the 2-10keV band is well above energies characterizing
the seed photons (believed to be generically in the optical/UV/EUV
band for AGN) but is well below the thermal cutoff of a typical disk
corona (above
). We shall relax both the energy
restriction and power-law assumption later.
These spectral fits are reported in Table 1. All fits
include absorption by the Galactic material along the line of sight
to MCG
6-30-15 (with column density
; Elvis et al. 1989), modelled using the tbabs
model of Wilms, Allen & McCray (2000). As shown in Paper I, a simple
power-law is a poor fit, with residuals clearly indicating a rather
narrow emission line at 6.4keV in addition to a broad excess
between 3-7keV. The 6.4keV feature is well fit by a narrow
Gaussian, resulting in a formal measurement of
keV for its energy. Thus, we can be secure in
identifying this as the fluorescent K
emission line of iron
which is in a rather low ionization state (less than FeXVII).
![]() |
As can be seen from Table 1, there are two rather
different models that fit the EPIC-pn data equally well: the partial
covering model and the relativistic ionized disk model. This
degeneracy can be broken by looking at the simultaneous higher energy
data from the RXTE-PCA. To allow for any possible
cross-calibration problems, we permit both the normalization and
power-law index of the PCA spectral model to vary independently of the
EPIC-pn spectral model. Indeed, we find that the PCA data require a
photon index that is flatter by
than the
EPIC-pn data, as is expected for the pre-LHEASOFT-5.3 PCA response
matrix . Figure 2 shows the joint pn-PCA fit
using each of these two spectral models. For completeness, these
figures show the fit to the full 0.5-10keV EPIC-pn band employing
the ``absorber+emitter'' soft X-ray model discussed in the next
section, although similar conclusions are reached by modelling just
the 2-10keV EPIC-pn spectrum in conjunction with the 3-15keV PCA
spectrum. It can clearly be seen that the partial covering model
grossly fails to reproduce the spectrum of this source above 10keV.
To further examine this issue, we perform a joint pn-PCA fit of a
combined spectral model that contains both relativistic disk features
and partial covering. It is found that the column density of the
partial absorber (assuming
) has an upper limit of
and is consistent with zero; we conclude
that a partial absorber, if present at all, has a negligible effect on
the part of the X-ray spectrum relevant to accretion disk studies.
Having shown that the partial covering model is not viable, we
conclude that the spectral complexity in the 2-10keV band of this
source is primarily due to X-ray reflection from an ionized disk. The
data require the disk component to be strongly broadened and
redshifted. Our spectral model includes these effects by convolving
the ionized reflection spectrum with the relativistic shifts expected
from a thin accretion disk around a near-extremal Kerr black hole with
dimensionless spin parameter
(Laor 1991). In addition to
using updated calibrations, these fits extend the previous work
reported in Paper I by employing the self-consistent models of X-ray
reflection from ionized material by Ballantyne, Ross & Fabian (2001).
Confirming the principal result of Paper I, the degree of relativistic
broadening required by these data pushes one to a high value of the
emissivity index and a low value of the inner disk radius. If one
fixes the inclination of the accretion disk at
(i.e., the
value derived from ASCA data by Tanaka et al. 1995 and used in
Paper I), the required emissivity index and inner radius are
and
), respectively. Allowing the
inclination to be a free parameter, the best fitting values are even
more extreme (
,
and
).