Kinematic studies of stars around the SMBH in the center of our own
Galaxy have only been possible in recent years with the development of
diffraction limited near infra-red imaging on large ground-based
telescopes. Before that, studies of the central regions of other
galaxies (where the obscuration problem is much less severe) were
crucial for establishing the existence of SMBHs. In particular, there
were two studies published in the mid-1990s that were pivotal in
providing compelling evidence for SMBHs -- the Hubble Space Telescope
(HST) observations of M87 and the radio observations of the H
O
MASERs in NGC 4258.
The center of M87 was an important target for HST since a central SMBH
had long been suspected based upon previous ground-based optical
observations of the galaxy's central regions
[86,87], as well as due to the presence of a
prominent synchrotron emitting jet of plasma that flows away from the
galaxy's core at relativistic speeds. HST imaged a disk of ionized
gas, with a radius of
centered on the galactic core
[88]. The high resolution of HST allowed the spectrum of
this ionized gas to be measured as a function of position across the
gas disk, thereby allowing the kinematics of the disk to be determined
[89]. It was found that the velocity profile of the
central
of the gas disk possessed a Keplerian profile (i.e.,
) as expected if the gas was orbiting in the
gravitational potential of a point-like mass
[89,90]. From the measured velocities of this
disk (
), the central mass was determined to be
. The only known and long-lived object to possess
such a large mass in a small region of space, and be as under-luminous
as observed, is a SMBH.
Similar conclusions were drawn for the center of the galaxy NGC 4258,
albeit using very different observational techniques
[91,92]. The center of this galaxy contains
molecular gas which is subjected to heating by a central X-ray source.
Collisional pumping of water within the molecular gas leads to a
population inversion thereby driving a naturally occurring maser. Both
the spatial position and line-of-sight velocity of the masing blobs
can be measured very accurately using radio observations (in
particular, the Very Long Baseline Array; VLBA). It is found that the
masers lie in a very thin disk (oriented almost edge-on to us) that is
orbiting a central object of mass
with an almost
perfect Keplerian velocity profile (with the velocity of the inner
masing region being
). The accuracy with which the
velocity profile follows a Keplerian law tightly constrains the
spatial extent of the central mass, again rendering any explanation
other than a SMBH very problematic. The direct detection of
centripetal accelerations within the masing regions provides a
powerful consistency check [93].
While the Galactic Center, M87 and NGC 4258 are important cases in the
argument for the existence of SMBHs, it is difficult to generalize
these observational techniques to all galaxies. A more generally
applicable technique is to examine the ensemble velocity distribution
of stars in the central region of a galaxy via observations of stellar
absorption lines in galactic spectra. By carefully comparing detailed
galactic models (that include the distribution of stars across the
possible phase space of orbits within a given gravitational potential)
with high quality imaging and spectral data, one can constrain the
mass of any central black hole. Using these techniques, several
authors have performed relatively large surveys of nearby galaxies in
order to examine the demographics of SMBHs. There are two exciting
results from these studies. Firstly, it appears that every galaxy
that possesses a well defined bulge contains a SMBH. Secondly, there
is a good correlation between the mass of the central black hole
and the mass of the galactic bulge (
), with
[94,95]. In fact, it has
been shown that the more fundamental (and better) correlation is
between the mass of the central SMBH and the velocity dispersion
(or ``temperature'', considering an analogy between stellar
kinematics in a galaxy and particle kinematics in a gas) of the
stellar population;
, with
[96,97]. The underlying cause for this
correlation is still the subject of intense work and much debate,
since these stars are far enough from the center of the galaxy to have
negligible direct influence from the gravitational field of the SMBH.
It is widely regarded that this correlation argues for a connection
between the formation of the SMBH and the galaxy itself.