The Entries!
Because we received just seven entries for our redesign contest, I've opted to post them all for public review. Below are thumbnails of sceencaptures that link to the example page. All screenshots were made in Mozilla Firefox 1.0.7, then resized and saved in Photoshop. I am very pleased with the entries. Please take a look and give us your feedback:
-- what do you like/don't like in the design?
-- did it work in your browser (let us know your browser and OS!)
-- what is your vote?!
Send your votes to Elizabeth Warner. The final decision will be based on the judging criteria and feedback from our users and will be made by Ms Warner and others in the Astronomy Department.
[Sample pages will open in a new window that you can close to get back to this page.]
screenshot link to sample page |
comment from entrant |
|
CDM_galaxy
sample index page |
For this design, I tried to keep the content and organization as similar to the existing page as possible, while changing the color scheme to remind me more of the night sky. I also aimed to limit the XHTML code to logical semantics, placing all style information in the stylesheet. This allows the page to be viewed and navigated easily in non-graphical browsers, such as text browsers and screen readers, and also allows future style changes to be made without editing the HTML at all. My page successfully validates as XHTML 1.0 Strict and CSS 2.1. Furthermore, the page adjusts well to user-selected font sizes. I have tested the design in a number of different browsers, and the results are available at http://cdmuhlb.student.umd.edu/public/observatory/screenshots/ . |
|
SY_SolarSystem
sample index page |
|
|
SY_AstroTerp
sample index page |
|
|
CDM_nebula
sample index page |
For this design, I've tried not to crowd too much content onto the entry page, and instead have it look open and attractive. The color scheme resembles some of ESA's websites (not really intentionally, that's just what color the image of the "Mountains of Creation" happened to be). I've removed some of the content that was on the original page, but it can easily be added back either on the right or at the bottom. I would suggest not placing the Clear Sky Clock on the home page, because it takes extra time to load, and a home page should load the fastest of any page on a site.
This page is slightly wider than the original, but I think most people's browsers at their default font setting should have no problem displaying it. It also adjusts nicely to different font settings, and if extra-extra-large fonts make the page too wide, it nicely moves some content below other elements, so the page is still very usable and attractive. This version is also slightly more IE-friendly, and every element renders correctly in every browser I've tried it on (Firefox, Konqueror, Opera, Safari, Internet Explorer, Lynx - see http://cdmuhlb.student.umd.edu/public/observatory/screenshots/ ). Once again, the markup is purely semantic and not stylistic, and validates as XHTML 1.0 Strict. |
|
SY_Ultra_MD
sample index page |
This one comes with some comments. First, notice how the main area and the quick info area have scroll bars? Well, the same thing will happen in the announcement area if the amount written exceeds the allotted space. Second, the navigation area will hold sub-menus as well (I tried to give an example of how this could be done by making up a HOME area sub-menu, but it will look better with more links added). Third, the design is image heavy, but since the graphics are completely independent of the user's location on the website (anything location dependent is done with text), the user will only have to load the graphics once. After the graphics are in the user's cache, loading for every other section of the website should be very quick. |
|
CJ_astro
sample index page |
On behalf of my group I'm submitting our vision of UMD's new observatory home page titled "Saturn."
We wanted the Observatory to have a sleek, modern looking home page that would attract more viewers. Our inspiration was an image of Saturn we found on NASA's image gallery. Having Saturn break out of the header box a little gives the page a more fluid look instead of just boxes of text. We also thought that bringing a warm color into the page would make it feel more inviting. As far as the layout of the text goes we like the side bar indicating important dates. We do feel that the web site would benefit from further organization. For example there are multiple pages with access to images. It would help organize the web page if the gallery link gave you access to all image links with headers descriding [sic] each set for example one set indicated as images taken by telescopes at your facility, one set perhaps showing a tour of equipment available at the observatory, another for images from events, and maybe another linking to NASA images or your image of the day. Also, for long pages of text with a good deal of information it might be helpful to have links at the top of that page that highlight each topic so viewers can quickly be taken to their topic of interest. This would also assist users with an motor disabilities. |
|
MJ_website
sample index page |
On Sunday night, I happened to wander by the UMD Observatory website, and I saw that you needed a new one. I've thrown one together, but I'll admit that I'm a little out of practice with web design. (It's been 2ish years since I made my last one) I've included a .zip file as an attachment which contains the page I've created. The entire site should validate as XHTML 1.0 Strict with the W3C validator. There are some 'warnings' on the stylesheet, but I really don't think they'll be a problem. Unfortunately, I do know there are at least four flaws with the site:
1) The menus don't display properly in Microsoft Internet Explorer. They're perfectly fine in Mozilla Firefox, and I'm not yet sure why they display differently. The menus are still quite functional in both browsers, but they don't look quite as clean in IE. I'm working on a solution, but no guarantees.
2) The image at the bottom of the page doesn't seem to want to line all of its elements up properly, and I didn't have time to fiddle with it.
3) The banner image could use a border around each letter to distinguish them from the background image, but I didn't have time.
4) I just realized that I forgot to include a link to the 'Operations' and 'UM Astronomy Resources' pages. I intended to add them, but I forgot until I started writing this email. They're not too difficult to add, and a different location may not be a bad idea anyway.
As far as suggestions go, I really just have one. As a matter of practice, it's considered bad form to include links in the side-navigation bars which link to other subdivisions of the site. The reason for this is that your side-navigation bar changes to contain different items when you click on the link, which can be generally bad for navigation, especially for new visitors. Instead, by forcing the visitor to click on one of the main navigation items to find what they're looking for, you get them to see more of your site at the expense of slowing them down very slightly. And of course, this also makes it more convenient in general, because then visitors know when the side-navigation bar will change, rather than having it change seemingly at random. The menu system I've included in my site design could also help to eliminate some of the inconvenience created by this suggestion |
About the competition
The UM Observatory needs a site that is both accessible and looks awesome. We need a site that reflects our aims, embodies our message and conveys our excitement about astronomy. Are you up for the challenge? This competition is open to everyone.
The deadline for entries is 8 March 2006. The entries will be judged and a winner announced on or about 15 March 2006.
Email files related to your design to ewarner@umd.edu.
How the designs will be judged
Each site will be judged against the following criteria:
* Aesthetics, colour contrast, balanced layout.
* Speed of download and display.
* Usability.
* Flexible presentation, e.g., layout, text size; colour choice.
In addition, based on the design we will aim to make the site
* Accessible.
* Cross platform and cross browser compatible.
Competition rules and guidance
The rules for this competition reflect our belief that a website can be usable and informative and still look great!
- The design is for the home page only, although the design can be considered a template.
- A powerpoint slide depicting the homepage may be submitted in lieu of html (for those who are not page coders)
- If submitting a webpage:
- The design should validate as XHTML 1 Strict.
- CSS is encouraged for both presentation and layout.
- The design should work in current browsers and degrade gracefully in older browsers.
- Content and links should reflect the current site (see a summary of current home page structure below).
- Liquid layout and not resolution or screen size specific.
- Provide a name for your design to help identify it during the judging and subsequent presentation on the site.
- Provide some words related to your thinking behind the design. This does not need to be more than a paragraph.
- Must make visitors think - 'I wish our site was as good as this'.
Be innovative
You are free to go beyond the stated requirements. Surprise the judges with your functional accessible design - and your creativity. However, cross browser/platform design is of primary importance, e.g., use of CSS 2 techniques that are not widely supported is probably not a good idea.
What do you get if you win?
Kudos, fame, infamy! Your design will be used on the UM Observatory website, and you will get a credit as the designer at the bottom of the page. In addition, the winner and up to 4 friends will get a private observing session at the Observatory.
Terms and conditions
* Each competitor can submit any number of designs.
* All designs must be original work.
* Judges decisions are final.
* No entries will be accepted after the closing date.
* Judges can't enter the competition.
* In case there is a lack of participation (<4 entries), Ms Warner has the discretion to continue with just the existing entries, extend the contest or cancel the contest.
How the winner will be picked
* A select group of UM Dept of Astronomy faculty, staff and grad students will look at all of the entries and select the top 5 (if there are more than 5 entries). If there are fewer than 5, Ms Warner may select which ones are posted publicly for feedback.
* Those 5 (or fewer) designs will be made public on the UM Observatory website to collect feedback, but the winner will be chosen by a selected judging panel (Ms Warner and others).
Existing Home Page structure and features.
Designs should contain the following list of page elements/structures.
* Introductory text (this is the blurb about the Open House that currently exists in the left menu).
* Header image or header text; designers are free to decide whether there should be an image or text at the top of the page.
Main menu:
* Programs
* Information
* Amateurs
* Gallery
Don't want to enter the contest?
Even if you don't want to enter the contest, please feel free to give us feedback on the current site structure and what we should keep, delete, or change when/if we redesign the website.
Last Updated: Monday December 08, 2008 by Elizabeth Warner
|