Data from Table 1 of Ambrosi et al. 2017, Nature, 552, 63. First column is the reported average cosmic ray electron+positron energy in each bin that they report, in units of GeV. Here we do not include the estimated uncertainty in that average; we use only the best estimate. Second column is the reported best estimate of the flux in that bin, in units of m^{-2} s^{-1} sr^{-1} GeV^{-1}. Third column is the reported statistical uncertainty in that bin, in the same units as the flux. Fourth column is the reported systematic error in that bin, in the same units as the flux. Here for simplicity we ignore the estimated background fraction (the second to last column in the original Table 1), which is less than 10% up to 2.63 TeV. In the paper the authors use the bins with average energy 58.8 GeV to 2452.8 GeV inclusive, so that's what we reproduce here. 58.8 8.32e-4 0.04e-4 0.21e-4 67.6 5.42e-4 0.03e-4 0.13e-4 77.6 3.54e-4 0.02e-4 0.09e-4 89.1 2.31e-4 0.01e-4 0.06e-4 102.2 1.52e-4 0.01e-4 0.04e-4 117.4 1.00e-4 0.01e-4 0.02e-4 134.8 6.49e-5 0.06e-5 0.16e-5 154.8 4.14e-5 0.04e-5 0.10e-5 177.7 2.78e-5 0.03e-5 0.07e-5 204.0 1.81e-5 0.03e-5 0.05e-5 234.2 1.20e-5 0.02e-5 0.03e-5 268.9 7.59e-6 0.14e-6 0.19e-6 308.8 4.81e-6 0.11e-6 0.12e-6 354.5 3.25e-6 0.08e-6 0.08e-6 407.1 2.12e-6 0.06e-6 0.05e-6 467.4 1.32e-6 0.05e-6 0.03e-6 536.6 8.49e-7 0.34e-7 0.21e-7 616.1 6.13e-7 0.27e-7 0.15e-7 707.4 3.92e-7 0.20e-7 0.10e-7 812.2 2.38e-7 0.15e-7 0.06e-7 932.5 1.52e-7 0.11e-7 0.04e-7 1070.7 9.29e-8 0.82e-8 0.27e-8 1229.3 4.38e-8 0.53e-8 0.14e-8 1411.4 4.99e-8 0.53e-8 0.17e-8 1620.5 1.52e-8 0.28e-8 0.06e-8 1860.6 1.07e-8 0.22e-8 0.05e-8 2136.3 6.24e-9 1.61e-9 0.30e-9 2452.8 3.84e-9 1.20e-9 0.21e-9