Many times I (and other scientists) have been puzzled by how what we say gets translated by the press. This is an example of what can happen even when the reporter has a Ph.D. in the same field. What we said was "the single greatest success of MOND to date is the a priori prediction of the behavior of low surface brightness galaxies." What was written makes it sound like these objects are a problem for the theory! This aspect seems to have been influenced by the work of Dalcanton & Bernstein which is unpublished and should remain so if the refereeing system is competent: their data are simply wrong.

Return to Literature page