This is a quick update on the Zpectrometer after our first stint of testing in the GB lab with the Ka-band frontend. We set up and ran internal tests on Sunday the 17th. On Monday we connected to the front end and got "first light" correlation functions that verify the system's basic operation. I attach a probably indecipherable copy of the result; but it's a good result! We spent Tuesday starting to chase down a problem I'll mention in a moment and in working with the software group to generate a complete set of FITS files to use in data flow testing. The Zpectrometer went into the anechoic chamber for RFI testing Wednesday morning and, having passed, was back in the lab and back on the network by lunch. We have three hardware problems to solve, one of which was planned, one semi-expected, and one that was unexpected and serious. The planned task is to flatten the gain across the four sub-bands now that we have measurements of the power levels as a function of frequency from the front end as seen through the channelizing downconverter. Our downconverter is pretty flat, but it seemed sensible to get measurements at its outputs rather than try to guess at what we'd get. We'll order gain equalizers early next week, and I expect that this will be sorted out by our commissioning time in mid-November. If they don't arrive some parts of the band will be noisier than others. The semi-expected problem is getting the power levels for our phase calibration tones within good ranges across the band. We see a fair amount of structure across the Ka-band, some broad stuff and some narrow dropouts. I think we'll be able to clear this up in our next lab visit in early October. We need to clear it up to get spectra, but we can think of schemes that aren't fully automatic (changing pads around, etc.) for the first little while. The unexpected problem is serious: we see the equivalent of a constant ~20 K input noise imbalance, when we should see something much closer to zero (the whole point of the correlation receiver architecture). The total power in the offset is 1/f or drifty for timescales longer than 3 seconds, making the receiver look like a moderately stable total power system with a 20 K receiver temperature. We have pinned the noise source down to somewhere in the front end with pretty high certainty. It is likely that it is internally generated noise that is modulated by a ground loop containing phase-switch driver currents. Although we're no longer in the lab at GB, miracles of modern technology etc. means that the Zpectrometer is still accessible to us over the internet. We will run tests today and tomorrow to try to isolate the problem further, with Galen in the lab and us on the computer here, connected by phone. Left unfixed, this offset would cause baseline structure and a loss of sensitivity. If the same effect is present for the Spectrometer it would account for at least much of the Spectrometer baseline problems. (We're trying to find someone to look at Ka-band Spectrometer data to check this.) There are work-arounds if we can't find and fix the offset, but they will involve some loss of resolution and sensitivity -- and then we'd have a total power receiver with no advantage from the correlation architecture! I'm pretty confident we'll find the source of the problem, though, and we have potential fixes for some of the possibilities even now. The software situation looks good. Although we'd planned to run with our existing software for the first year or so, the GB software group felt that the interactions between the Zpectrometer and telescope and observer would be better handled by adding the Zpectrometer to the general system. We have provided one of our instrument computers so the manager has something to talk to, and the software group ran a full observation using that and other simulators for some of the GB systems. Still some bugs, of course, but nothing fundamental so far and we're at a stage now where software work on data processing can proceed independently of the hardware.